Tim vs AI: The Final Content Showdown

In partnership with

This Is For All The Marbles…

Alright, over the last few weeks, we’ve wandered through content distribution, content strategy & content creation. I’ve thrown a ton of AI prompts at you. I am 99.967% sure that NONE of you put them to use. (It’s OK…I’m not mad…just disappointed…😹). (Editor’s Note: This is a lengthy email - maybe read it online, otherwise it might be clipped if you are a Gmail person.)

To recap, we are going to follow the exact steps in our content creation guide:

You’ll get all of ChatGPT’s outputs & the brAIniac final version. (See what I did there - with AI in the middle? Oh, Tim, you are such a scamp!) Then I’ll take the same outline and give it a human treatment. In the interest of a fair fight, I have NOT seen the AI final version…

Let The Battle Commence

Just a note - these are all the content creation steps from Inner Circle #85 & some content strategy (topic exploder) in Inner Circle #86. We are only including the prompt for the ICP stage - the rest of the prompts are in are in those two issues.

ICP: 

Prompt: I want to clearly define my ideal client profile (ICP). Here are the basics I know so far: digital marketing/design/tech agencies, $750K–$2M revenue, founder-led sales, US/Canada. Please give me a clear, concise ICP description (2–3 sentences) that highlights their role, goals, current struggles, and what they’re trying to achieve.

Output: Our ICP is the founder of a $1M-ish agency (7–20 people) who still runs both sales and delivery. Their goals are to stabilize growth and step into a real CEO role, but they’re stuck with fragile margins, unpredictable pipeline, and decision fatigue. They want systems that create predictable revenue without depending on their personal hustle.

PAINT POINT ENRICHMENT:

Referrals slowed down and I don’t have a real outbound system.”
If I hire, profit tanks; if I don’t, I drown.”
I close deals because buyers want me on the calls—how do I escape that?”
Projects swing cashflow like a pendulum—no stability.”
We look like every other agency—no clear differentiator.”

ACTIONABLE PERSONA:

Who: Founder of a ~$1M agency, 8–15 people, juggling sales + ops.
Goals: Stable pipeline, higher margins, growth without heroic effort.
Top pains: “No predictable lead gen,” “hiring crushes profit,” “I’m the bottleneck.”
Opportunities to help: Install repeatable GTM, remove founder from prospecting, sharpen POV to escape sameness.

CODIFY VALUE PROP:

We help $1M-ish agencies escape the Danger Zone by installing a repeatable GTM and sales motion that doesn’t depend on the founder. You get a pipeline you can forecast, margins you can protect, and a positioning edge that stops you from competing on tactics. Outcome: founder out of low-value sales work, business into controlled growth.

MAP PAIN POINTS

OK - take a deep, cleansing breath. You probably need a break. Enjoy this ad from AdQuick - and for you digital agency folks, for the right client, this is a super-interesting OOH play made easy. Q4 idea? I dunno, but check them out.

Run ads IRL with AdQuick

With AdQuick, you can now easily plan, deploy and measure campaigns just as easily as digital ads, making them a no-brainer to add to your team’s toolbox.

You can learn more at www.AdQuick.com

TOPIC CLUSTERS:

Cluster A: Escaping Founder-Led Sales
→ Why $1M Is the Most Dangerous Number
→ The False-Summit Syndrome
→ Founder-to-GTM: 30-day transition plan
→ First-rep readiness checklist
→ Handoff rules that stop “Can you just join this call?”
Cluster B: Margin Protection at $1M
→ The Hiring See-Saw: When to add, when to wait
→ Productize your “best 20%” into a core offer
→ Pricing ladders that keep profit intact
→ How to say no without losing the deal
→ Quarterly margin review: what to cut, what to keep
Cluster C: Pipeline You Can Predict
→ Triggers > Lists: Prospecting that doesn’t suck
→ Angles that earn replies (w/ examples)
→ From one-off campaigns to weekly GTM rhythm
→ Why LinkedIn + email beats either alone
→ Dashboards that actually drive action

CONTENT OUTLINE

Title options:
Why $1M Is the Most Dangerous Number in Agency Growth
The $1M Danger Zone: Too Big to Wing It, Too Small to Coast
Key points:
→ False summit: $1M feels like arrival—actually the riskiest stage.
→ Founder trap: your business still runs on your personal stamina.
→ Margin mirage: hiring/not hiring both hurt—solve with offer + ops design.
→ Pipeline panic: referrals ≠ strategy—install a weekly GTM rhythm.
Examples: Brief story of a founder stuck in 12 sales calls/wk; simple capacity math showing margin leak; 4-block weekly GTM cadence.
CTA: “If you’re in the Danger Zone, reply ‘DANGER’ and I’ll send the 30-day escape plan.”  

Before we get into the final showdown…take a minute and think if Roku could be a good opportunity for your clients in Q4. Connected TV advertising can be really complex. Roku is a great way to simplify campaign creation and targeting.

Kickstart your holiday campaigns

CTV should be central to any growth marketer’s Q4 strategy. And with Roku Ads Manager, launching high-performing holiday campaigns is simple and effective.

With our intuitive interface, you can set up A/B tests to dial in the most effective messages and offers, then drive direct on-screen purchases via the remote with shoppable Action Ads that integrate with your Shopify store for a seamless checkout experience.

Don’t wait to get started. Streaming on Roku picks up sharply in early October. By launching your campaign now, you can capture early shopping demand and be top of mind as the seasonal spirit kicks in.

Get a $500 ad credit when you spend your first $500 today with code: ROKUADS500. Terms apply.

Holiday performance starts now.

CHAT GPT FINAL DRAFT

👉 Why $1M Is the Most Dangerous Number in Agency Growth

The Champagne Problem
Everyone treats hitting $1M in revenue like it’s the business equivalent of winning the Super Bowl. You’ve got founders popping champagne, screenshotting Stripe dashboards, and humblebragging on LinkedIn about “crossing 7 figures.” Cute.

But here’s the ugly truth: $1M is not a trophy. It’s a trap.

The reality is that $1M is the Danger Zone — that weird middle place where your agency is too big to wing it and too small to coast. At this stage, the things that got you here (referrals, heroic effort, founder charm) are exactly the things that will hold you back.

The False Summit
The first problem with $1M is the illusion it creates. It feels like the summit — you’ve built something real, you’ve paid people, you’ve got some credibility. And yet, the mountain doesn’t end here.
What actually happens is you’ve reached a ridge, not the peak. You can see further now — the need for systems, leadership, consistent growth — and suddenly the climb looks steeper, not easier. The sense of arrival? Total mirage.

The Founder Trap
At $1M, you’re still the “chief everything officer.” Sales, ops, HR, therapist, janitor. Every client problem ends up in your lap. Every deal hinges on your personal involvement. Every big decision still requires your thumbs-up.
On paper, you’re the CEO. In practice, you’re still an overworked account manager with better branding. And that’s the real trap: the business isn’t running on systems, it’s running on you. Which means your business is only as healthy as your caffeine supply and your ability to keep grinding.

The Margin Mirage
Let’s talk about money, because this is where things get dicey.

At $1M, you finally have enough revenue to justify some hires — maybe a senior strategist, maybe a project manager. But here’s the catch: if you hire too early, the profit vanishes. If you wait too long, you suffocate under the workload. Either way, you lose.

This is the margin mirage: it looks like you’ve got room, but the math doesn’t work unless you reshape your offers, tighten delivery, and actually price for profit. Most founders don’t. They assume growth alone will cover the gap. It doesn’t.

Pipeline Panic
Then there’s the pipeline. The ugly little secret of most $1M agencies? They don’t actually have one.
They’ve been riding referrals, word-of-mouth, and the occasional inbound lead. But the volume slows. The quality dips. Suddenly you’re staring at HubSpot like it owes you money, wondering why nobody’s booking calls anymore.
At $1M, referral-only growth stops working. You don’t need “a few more leads.” You need a system — something you can run weekly, track, and actually count on. Without that, the $1M business is just a house of cards waiting for the wind to shift.

The Identity Crisis
The last piece of the Danger Zone puzzle is identity.
Are you still the scrappy startup that can promise the moon because you’ll work 100 hours a week? Or are you a “real agency” that charges like one, runs like one, and commands respect?
Most $1M founders are stuck between those two identities. They want the credibility of being established but cling to the hustle culture of the early days. That tension keeps them from stepping into the next level of leadership.

Escaping the Danger Zone

Here’s the good news: $1M isn’t death row. It’s just a turning point.
The way out isn’t working harder — it’s building differently. Three levers matter most:

1. Install a repeatable GTM rhythm: Weekly triggers, angles, outreach, and review. Pipeline becomes math, not magic.

2. Productize your best 20%: Double down on what you deliver best, package it so it scales, and price it for margin.

3. Fire yourself from low-value sales: Get out of first calls, stop being the bottleneck, and let a system (or team) handle top-of-funnel.
   

That’s the only way agencies survive the Danger Zone: by evolving from “founder heroics” to “founder leadership.”

The Bottom Line

$1M feels like a finish line, but it’s not. It’s the start of the real game.

If you’re in the Danger Zone, you don’t need more champagne. You need a map. You need systems, positioning, and a pipeline that doesn’t depend on you showing up to every call. Because the truth is this: agencies don’t die at zero. They die at $1M — when the founder gets stuck, the systems don’t appear, and the business slowly eats itself alive.

So if you’re in the Danger Zone, stop flexing about the revenue and start asking: what’s my plan to get out?

👉 Reply “DANGER” and I’ll send you the 30-day escape plan.

TIM’S FINAL DRAFT (FROM SAME OUTLINE)

There is SO much hype around creating a “7-Figure” business. You’d like to think that if you hit $1,000,000 in annual revenue, you’d be on easy street, right? That’s a lot of money, after all. $83,333.33/mo in revenue - that’s Frank Sinatra territory, baby…

A Million - In This Economy?

Tons of entrepreneurs dream about hitting 7 figures. It’s pretty freaking cool, after all. According to the SBA, only about 10% of businesses ever hit that mark. If you aren’t careful, hitting a milly might actually be pretty dangerous.

Of course, you ought to try to hit a million, or 10 million, or a 100 million - you do you, boo - but those milestones don’t actually change your business any, they just bring The Notorious B.I.G. to your party singing, “Mo money, mo problems.”

For most founders, at $1mm, the business is running because you are making it run. You are the million dollar engine. It’s pretty likely you could hold your biz together for 3 months if your team left. But there’s just about zero chance that the reverse is true.

But right around that same time, the business starts to get too big to fit in your brain. So you need to hire people who can OWN parts of your operations or processes. But there’s 4 big issues that are probably smacking you in the face if you are in this position:

1. Financial chaos is breaking out.

2. Your ambition is gonna grow…

3. You likely sell and manage on vibes, not processes.

4. Growth math demands more.

The financial chaos is the most obvious gremlin. You want to hire someone who is great to handle ops, or clients, or sales. Great people cost money. New hires (even if they are great) take time to start being productive and adding to your margin. If you haven’t been on point with your cash…you are going to experience the Margin Mirage. As your revenue has climbed, you almost certainly started paying yourself better. You probably started paying your team better, too. Here’s the $64 question - do you have enough margin for enough time to support a new hire that is going to be a full on cost center for 90-120 days? It’s dangerous here at a milly, because your expectations have grown. You are more ambition. You can see even better things ahead & you might spend down your reserves and your margin by hiring ahead of your growth.

You’ve reached a pinnacle that 9 out of 10 businesses won’t. But you realize that this mountain peak that you’ve hit really just gives you the vantage point of seeing how many bigger mountains there are. You are going to want to move SO fast because you can almost taste the sweet nectar of $5mm already. But because you have a bigger team, and bigger ambitions, you are going to have to plan BETTER. (I know, that sucks…but better planning means you won’t fall off Mount Million.

There’s a math problem here on Mount Million, too. For a long time, if you added a $3K/mo or a $5K/mo client, you were adding a ton of profit fuel to the engine (percentage-wise, anyway). At $30K/mo, you grew your business by nearly 17%. At $83K/mo, that same client only adds 6%. On a monthly basis, the same revenue increases, generate less profit growth… And, you likely have more clients, which means that you will have a higher number of clients churning and some of your older clients probably aren’t that profitable, so you, eventually want to proactively churn them…

In short:

• Your fancy $1mm agency is now hungry AF

• Your fancy $1mm agency demands better talent.

• Your fancy $1mm agency is too big to fit in your brain so you are officially the biggest bottleneck and you are suffocating your agency.

Having a $1,000,000 Agency Sounds Fun, Right?

Actually, it is. You have a certain level of stability, so you can take a deep breathe every once in a while. Plus, your agency works…it got you to 7 figures, and that ought to make you proud.

But what got you here isn’t going to get you there, as they say. Here’s a short list of things to evaluate:

1. You are slowing some part of the business down, even if you don’t think that you are. Get some outside eyes on your situation. The WTF Agency Assessment might be a pretty good place to start.

2. Your team needs to level up and get better a delivery, strategy & execution. Helping them level up is crucial - maybe investing into a Foxwell membership, or sending team members to Demandcurve’s Growth School, or Strategy Finishing School might be helpful. (I’ve sent my teams over the years to these sorts of things, and I can vouch for the quality of these, explicitly.)

3. You need to take things off your plate and stop winging it. Getting structure into your sales is pretty great - Fire Yourself From Sales can definitely help. Making lead gen a true process that you manage rather than do is another winner - GTM OS can be a huge accelerant. And making visibility & social authority a team sport rather than just relying on you getting inspired to post on LinkedIn is a massive, compounding win (and it’s fun as hell), so GEN+ might be right up your alley.

4. Chances are, too, that you need a little help in learning to think less like a scrappy freelancer and start thinking like a CEO. Read Extreme Ownership, Leaders Eat Last, Dare to Lead and maybe, too, set up a call and learn about working with me 1 on 1 to discover your true leadership style.

These Little Town Blues Are Melting Away

But for you to stay and grow from $1mm - it takes a different mindset. It’s not the “you” show any more. You’ve got to really learn to create team members that are better than you at what they do, you’ve got to learn to share the operational ownership of your business, and you’ve got to know how to maximize the impact of your business. It’s not easy to get above the $1mm zone of false success, but it’s the most satisfying thing you can accomplish professionally.

Which One Did You Like Better?

A couple of things to note - from ICP to draft, ChatGPT took about 2 minutes to create their draft. I didn’t time myself carefully, but I would guess 20ish minutes of writing from the outline to ready in Beehiiv (you can save some cash if you want to splurge on your own newsletter, btw.) Normally, from vague idea to Beehiiv ready, this newsletter takes about 45-60 minutes.

So Chat GPT is FASTER. I find that ChatGPT writing is “fine”, but it’s boring. Similar sentence structures, similar rhythms, etc. It’s also very “general” - it doesn’t have stories or Biggie Smalls at the ready, so it feels a little “blah”.

My version definitely has some more life to it - but TBH, along the way, the 4 problems that smack you in the face that enumerated didn’t match what I wrote exactly, so I have to go back and edit. (And I would be shocked if there weren’t a typo - ADHD & a dusting of dyslexia will make that a forever challenge for me.)

Normally, I never have ChatGPT write more than a few sentences at a time. Normally, when I am in a ChatGPT assisted zone, I take the outline, add detailed points or nuances to the major outline points, and let ChatGPT take a swing at just that one outline point. I ALWAYS edit/rewrite any text that ChatGPT generates, but that accelerates the process immensely because the cognitive writing load is lessened and I can focus on style and fun.

I’ll never outsource content creation to ChatGPT - but you probably won’t ever find me creating content without doing the pre-work and organizing without my brAIniac companion.

What Did You Think?

Start learning AI in 2025

Keeping up with AI is hard – we get it!

That’s why over 1M professionals read Superhuman AI to stay ahead.

• Get daily AI news, tools, and tutorials

• Learn new AI skills you can use at work in 3 mins a day

• Become 10X more productive

Sign up and start mastering AI

Meet HeyGen’s Creative OS - because apparently AI hates the idea of a full production team, wrangling multiple platforms & creative differences that come to fisticuffs. Now, just whisper a prompt and like an MLB 3rd baseman with a giant chaw, it spits out a stream of polished TikToks, explainers, or UGC clips. It’s like some cinematic fairy god-agent who has a friend with access to the really good stuff from Medellin.

Our sponsorships are ads (obviously - duh). But some of the companies or services linked in our content may pay us a minimal commission if you buy something from them. Potential payment is never a factor in what we link to, and we have direct experience with every company or service where you can buy something that we mention in our content.