The Creativity Crisis - Part 2

This is a continuation of Inner Circle Issue 119: Is There A Creativity Crisis? Quick recap for those of you that are new (or didn’t read last issue):

  1. Marketers have seriously overindexed on “optimization”.

  2. We’ve all succumbed to the terrible disease technoplasmosis.

  3. Our short term thinking (“gotta make our numbers this quarter”) has penalized failure so much that marketers only iterate, rather than innovate.

So, Is There A Creativity Crisis?

Specifically, no.

There are people in the world who are CRAZY creative. I think Sarah Sherman of SNL is crazy creative, the author Hernan Diaz is amazing (Trust is an amazing book) & Vince Gilligan (Breaking Bad & Pluribus) is a creative story teller.

But in marketing? Yes

Databox is what happens when someone finally got tired of watching agency owners spend more time wrestling spreadsheets than actually running their business—it's the BI tool that doesn't require a PhD or six-figure consultant to connect your 130+ data sources and make them look pretty. If your "reporting system" is still a Frankenstein’s monster of Google Sheets, HubSpot exports, and prayers, this might be the intervention you actually deserve. (And Databox CEO, Pete Caputa, is a font of insight on LinkedIn.)

So Why Is This a Crisis?

I might be overstating it a bit…BUT…there have never been more minutes spent on screens than 2025. There has never been more content available to somebody online than ever before.

Via awisee, screentime increased by 2.5% YoY (2024 to 2025). We all have richer digital footprints, more targeting data & ad clickthrough rates haven’t kept pace with the growth of impressions. If CTR’s aren’t increasing faster than the rate of visibility, then the creative is to blame…because targeting in UNDENIABLY better.

Better data collection means better targeting. Better targeting should generate more clicks (well targeted ad + right person ought to result in a click). But via Growth Jockey, 61% of consumers avoid brands that show them the same ad again and again. Unravel Research shares my concern that in our quest for efficiency (one ad that can be repurposed to any and every channel), we have rushed headlong into paint by numbers ads.

We’ve All Seen This Image Before, Right?

It isn’t an accident that this ad construct is right about 113% of the time. Marketers have studied how people ingest information and shaped ads to match. But the digital age became a giant copy machine, so all ads started to converge into something that basically looked the same.

Make 2026 Your Best Year Yet

Get access to my 2026 Annual Planning training. You’ll get 90 minutes of training around setting sales goals and sales forecasting, creating a hiring plan (and knowing exactly how much you can pay for that team), ways to make managing your agency finances simple & how to create a team wide content engine that keeps you in front of your target market.

It’s free. There’s no sales pitch at the end. Really.

We’ve Let It Slip Into The Way We Sell & The Way We Talk About Ourselves

A few weeks ago, I did a search in Apollo.io and pulled up 100 agencies in the US between $5mm-$50mm in revenue. I threw out anybody I actually knew…and then sent my crafty little AI agent out into the world to find out what these agencies had to say about themselves…here are the patterns that I saw:

  • “We are an extension of your team” (or similar) - 64%

  • “We are data driven” (or similar) - 68%

  • We are focused on ROI/ROAS” (or similar) - 61%

  • “We have an experienced team” (or similar) - 79%

Disclaimer - this wasn’t scientific. There was no segmentation, there was no control group or anything - so this data might be squishy. BUT the salient point here is that this kind of homogenization EXISTS. It wasn’t hard to find.

Advertising Has Trained People What To Expect From Ads

And we’ve trained ourselves to live inside a very narrow lane of expression that means that we mostly sound alike to our market. We, the creative rebels of the business world, have MBA’d, CPA’d and SOP’d ourselves into an undistinguishable blob of jargony metrics and uninspired GTM phraseology. Sometimes, I think it is stunning that any decent marketer buys anything from an agency.

As an industry, I feel as if we are all some variant of these stock photos that come up when you do an image search for “marketer”.

I Know How Hard This Is…

I spent years running agencies and anything out of the box feels like a mistake, or a risk, especially when you are under $5mm in revenue. It can be pretty scary there.

But take a minute and think about the things that you know about:

  1. Pattern Interrupts

  2. Headlines

  3. Copy

  4. Authenticity

  5. Relevance

  6. Personalization

There’s a thousand things that you preach to your clients every day. You push them. You tell them that growth is on the other side of the comfort zone. You tell them that the competition is fierce and “creative is the new targeting”.

Take Your Own Advice…

Not in the “optimize the shit out of the ad campaign” kind of advice, but in the “YOLO” & “I gotta be me…” kind of way. Stretch & grow and at least specifically, end the creativity crisis.

Our sponsorships are ads (obviously - duh). But some of the companies or services linked in our content may pay us a minimal commission if you buy something from them. Potential payment is never a factor in what we link to, and we have direct experience with every company or service where you can buy something that we mention in our content.

Keep Reading

No posts found